requestId:68499ac0497496.89868094.

The destiny of artificial intelligence must be respected in the era of artificial intelligence

Author: Cai Hengjin (Wuhan Major Computer Science Institute)

Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published

Original published in “Hunan Major News” No. 1, 2019, No. 1, 2019 Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and the 2nd day of the first month of Jihai

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           � The particularity of humans comes from the distinction between “self” and “outside”. Strong self-consciousness allows us to control the conscious mind in a continuous and voluntary way. This is exactly the bottleneck point of the development of artificial intelligence and the grand risk of super intelligence facing “darkness”. The machine can be seen as a human extension, but it does not have a natural kindness. Only by sharing the cosmic and ethical consciousness and becoming a “me” with the machine structure, can humans be relatively safe and humans move forward to a good future.

 

Keywords:Self-consciousness; Supreme Tyranny; Infinite

 

Author Introduction: Cai Hengjin (1964-), male, from Huangjia, Hubei, Baobao.com SingleWuhan Major Computer Science Institute, doctoral supervisor, important research on service science, artificial intelligence, and blockchain technology. His representative works include “The Prominence of Machine Protrusion – The End of Self-Ideology and Human Intelligence”.

 

1, Introduction

 

In philosophy, there is a Chen’s thoughtful experiment “The Ship of Theseus” [1]. It was first recorded by Plutak. It describes a ship that can fly on the sea for hundreds of years. It is due to continuous maintenance and replacement parts, such as the replacement once the parts are damaged and lost. A regular visitor. The paradox is that if all the performance components are replaced, can this ship still be the original ship? Or has it become a completely different ship? If it was not the original ship, then when did it no longer be the original ship? The philosopher Thomas Hobbes extended the paradox: if the old parts removed from the ship of Theseus were used to come from the headCaring a ship, then which of these two ships is Theseus’ ship?

 

We believe that although the parts are completely different from the original ship, they still need to fit the parts. Then the ship that can operate is the ship of Theseus, which is the main nature of the whole body. Our bodies break every year enough to create or form 6 bladders, 8 gas tubes, 18 livers, 200 pesticides, and the major organs of adults change new data every 7 years. href=”https://twsugargirl.org/”>Bao girls[2], but we all criticize the “me” as it is still the “me”, because the “self” can be retracted or extended to the connotation [3]. Self-consciousness is divergent and continuous, and must exist with the help of the flesh and brain, but in cognition can be independent of the material brain.

 

Artificial intelligence develops so quickly that ordinary people 博官网 will underestimate its rate. First, the reaction rate of a machine is already in the nanosecond level, while the reaction rate of a human is millisecond level, which means that a human can do things in 1 millisecond, and the machine can do 106 times. Secondly, the iterative evolution rate of the computer’s computing ability is much faster than we imagined. According to Morrow’s law, the machine will double every year and a half to two years. It turns out that It refers to chips. Now the drawing algorithm is also suitable. For example, the birth of AlphaGo to AlphaGo Zero is only two years apart, but it can only be grand.

 

The rapidly developing AI brings two dimensions of impact. First, for infinite games, sensory machines will definitely exceed humans. If a person is a physical system that can be restored, then the meaning of human existence that includes morality and ethics will be questioned. 2. Assuming that people cannot be physically restored simply, then we must answer the uniqueness of humans, whether machines can obtain this particularity, if they can obtain it, how the machines should evolve, and how human machines in the future should be related.

 

To clearly answer these series of questions, we must first determine whether people can be physically restored. The debate about this question is very large, and the question of whether people can have their own will until now progresses. It’s extremely unlimited. Laplace’s decision is very big. Even though it introduces statistics and quantum, physical equations still belong to decisions, which define the initial conditions and boundary conditions. The next process is to move forward according to the established rules, so they emphasize that people are not unique, that is, physical systems that can be restored. But is this true? Can we still find a way to respond to this challenge?

 

2,The singular influence of self-consciousness

 

From the perspective of “experienced brain hypothesis” [4], the starting point of human consciousness is the binary analysis of “self” and “outside”. The power of people knows comes from constantly exploring what the “self” is, and also to figure out what the “outside” (internal environment) is that interacts with the “self”. In this process, people will give a lot of meanings to “self” and “outside”, including religion, ethics, morality, philosophy, etc. These meanings, including the “self”, do not exist from the perspective of the physical world, but we as living entities will discover and criticize that the “self” can exist. The “self-consciousness” that emerges from human evolution is a very active energy. It seems to be illusory and can slowly and firmly guide the “self” to truly change the physical world and cooperate with it to evolve [5].

 

The existence of self-consciousness can be proved by actively changing the physical world through self-consciousness. Simple explanation through interaction is lacking. Just like a stone can also produce an offensive response through human influence, but this does not mean that the stone has self-consciousness. As long as the life bodies like humans store energy through food, then release energy according to their own will, and then have an impact on the physical world, this is the manifestation of the existence of self-consciousness. Self-consciousness has a certain connection with unrestrained will and subjective energy. [6-Baobao7]

 

We have no evidence to confess that “God” has participated in the process of self-consciousness. Of course, we have good intentions for “self-consciousness”. It is very clear that it is like some people think that every particle has self-consciousness, and the universe has self-consciousness since its birth, but if this is true, then there should be evidence to express intelligence or consciousness on the micro-level, rather than to observe self-consciousness based on the standard of similar macroscopicity in the human body. The starting point of self-consciousness is relatively low, but this does not seem to mean that human intelligence is also low, because the “self” is constantly growing, constantly evolving, and always exceeding itself. The human in the evolutionary theory is a statement that the apes and people continue to evolve, which can be said to be consistent with this development method.

 

Self-consciousness is not obtained through practice, but through the structural sense of our bodies. Once we form an awareness of the “self”, this concept will be preserved and will not be erased. Having self-consciousness is different from a machine in human categoryMain attribute. Under the influence of self-consciousness, humans can conduct a scheming of conscious thoughts (knowing the scatteredness [8]), and control the various scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scattered scatter

 

In the past, I usually thought that machines were not interested in understanding, but now people can distribute (human) ideology films to machines, and machines can also forcefully complete

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *